Free Tool · No login required

What are the top podcasts in any country right now?

Read Apple's live top-shows chart for 51 storefronts and 20 categories. Pick a market, pick a category, get the ranking Apple is publishing this hour — with a shareable link for every chart.

The chart reloads as soon as you change either selector.

How to read an Apple podcast chart

  • Charts are per storefront. There is no global Apple podcast chart. A country selection is not a filter on one worldwide list — it selects an entirely separate ranking.
  • Rank is not audience. Apple publishes ordering only. No download, listener, or follower count appears anywhere in this data, and none can be inferred from a position.
  • Movement is driven by velocity. Shows gaining followers quickly outrank larger shows with flat growth, which is why chart positions churn far faster than actual audiences do.
  • Categories are not comparable. Rank 12 in Comedy and rank 12 in Government describe wildly different levels of activity.
  • An empty chart is a real answer. Smaller storefronts do not publish a ranking for every category; when Apple returns nothing, this page says so rather than inventing rows.

What Apple's podcast charts actually measure — and what they don't

Apple's top-podcasts feed is the oldest continuously published ranking in podcasting, and for a long stretch of the medium's history it was the only public scoreboard anyone had. That history is why a chart position still carries weight in press coverage, sponsorship conversations, and network pitch decks. It is also why the number is so routinely misread. The feed publishes an ordered list of shows for one Apple storefront and one category. It publishes no counts of any kind: no downloads, no unique listeners, no followers, no completion rate. Every claim of the form "this show has X million listeners because it charted at #3" is an inference layered on top of data that does not contain the input.

The per-storefront structure is the first thing that trips people up. Apple computes a separate chart for each country's store, so the US chart and the German chart are not two views of one ranking — they are two rankings built from two disjoint populations. A show can hold a top-five position in Ireland and be entirely absent from the United Kingdom chart next door, and that is normal rather than an anomaly. For anyone researching a market before launching a localised show, or checking whether a format that works in one country has any traction in another, flipping the country selector is the whole experiment. It is also why "the world's number one podcast" is a marketing phrase and not a measurable object: no cross-storefront Apple chart exists to be number one in.

The second misreading concerns what moves a show up. Apple has never documented its chart algorithm, so anything stated with certainty about the formula is a guess. What is observable from watching the feed is that the ranking responds much more strongly to the rate at which a show is gaining new followers than to how many people already listen. This produces the pattern every publisher eventually notices: a launch week, a viral clip, or a well-timed cross-promotion drops a show into the top ten for a few days, after which it slides out while its actual download numbers have not moved at all. The corollary is uncomfortable but useful — a mature show with a large, stable, extremely loyal audience will lose the chart to a smaller show that is growing faster, every single time. Chart position measures momentum, not size.

The third issue is cross-platform comparison. Apple, Spotify, and YouTube each rank only the listening that happens inside their own product, each with an undisclosed and different weighting, and they disagree constantly. It is unremarkable for three platforms to publish three different number-one shows for the same country on the same day. When a show ranks far higher on one platform than another, the honest reading is that its audience skews toward that platform — not that one chart is wrong. This is exactly the kind of question the chart selector is good for: check the same market and category across a week and the shape of the competition becomes visible in a way a single screenshot never shows.

Used carefully, the chart remains genuinely informative. Watching one country-and-category pair over consecutive weeks reveals which shows hold position (durable audiences) versus which spike and vanish (campaign-driven). Comparing a category chart against the all-categories chart for the same storefront shows how much total listening that category commands in that market. Checking a small storefront reveals whether a category has enough activity there to publish a chart at all — a blunt but real signal about market maturity. None of that requires knowing Apple's formula. It only requires reading the chart as what it is: a public, per-market, per-category ordering that refreshes constantly and is fetched here, unmodified, at the timestamp printed above the list.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Every chart on this page is read live from Apple's public top-podcasts RSS endpoint at itunes.apple.com/<country>/rss/toppodcasts/limit=<n>/genre=<id>/json. Nothing is hand-curated, hand-ranked, or re-ordered. The response you see is Apple's ranking for that storefront and category at the moment it was fetched, and the fetch timestamp is printed above the list.

Apple recomputes its storefront charts on its own schedule, typically at least once per day. This page caches each country + category + limit combination for one hour, so a refresh within that hour returns the cached copy (the API sends an X-Cache: HIT header) and a refresh after it re-fetches from Apple (X-Cache: MISS). The "fetched" timestamp above the list always tells you which one you are looking at.

Apple's top-level podcast genre IDs are 1301 Arts, 1321 Business, 1303 Comedy, 1304 Education, 1483 Fiction, 1511 Government, 1512 Health & Fitness, 1487 History, 1305 Kids & Family, 1502 Leisure, 1310 Music, 1489 News, 1314 Religion & Spirituality, 1533 Science, 1324 Society & Culture, 1545 Sports, 1318 Technology, 1488 True Crime, and 1309 TV & Film. Genre 26 is the parent "Podcasts" node used for the all-categories chart. You can pass either the numeric ID or the readable slug in the URL — ?genre=1488 and ?genre=true-crime resolve to the same chart.

Not necessarily identical. This tool reads Apple's public top-podcasts RSS feed, which is the ranking Apple publishes for programmatic access. The Top Shows chart rendered inside the Apple Podcasts app and on podcasts.apple.com/charts is generated by Apple separately and can refresh at a different moment, so ordering near the bottom of a long list may differ by a position or two. Treat this page as Apple's published feed, not as a reverse-engineered guess at the in-app chart.

Apple charts are computed per storefront, not globally. A show that sits at #1 in the US chart may not appear at all in the German or Japanese chart, because the ranking reflects activity from accounts registered to that storefront. There is no worldwide Apple podcast chart to select; the country selector is the chart.

Yes. The URL updates as you change the selectors, so /tools/podcast-chart-explorer?country=DE&genre=news loads the German news chart directly, and ?country=BR&genre=true-crime loads the Brazilian true crime chart. You can also append &limit=100 for a longer list. Copy the address bar, or use the Copy link button under the results.

This page requests 50 rows by default. The underlying API accepts any limit from 1 to 100, set with the limit query parameter, so ?limit=100 gives you the longest chart Apple's RSS endpoint will serve and ?limit=10 gives you a quick top ten. Values outside 1–100 are rejected with a 400 invalid_limit error rather than silently clamped.

Smaller storefronts do not always publish a ranked chart for every category. When that happens Apple returns a valid but empty feed, and this page tells you so in plain language instead of showing a fake list or an error. An empty result is a real answer about that market, not a failure of the tool. Try the all-categories chart for the same country to confirm the storefront itself is publishing.

No. Apple does not publish download or listener counts in these feeds, and no rank can be converted into an audience number. Rank is a relative ordering within one storefront and one category. For actual audience figures you need the show's own hosting statistics measured against the IAB Podcast Measurement Technical Guidelines v2.2, which only the publisher can see.

Each platform ranks only its own listening activity and publishes its own chart, using undisclosed and different weightings. Apple's chart, Spotify's podcast charts, and YouTube's podcast charts routinely disagree about the top show in the same country on the same day. None of them is a cross-platform ranking, so comparing a show's Apple rank to its Spotify rank tells you about platform mix, not about total audience.

Apple has never published its chart formula, so anything stated with certainty about the weighting is a guess. The observable behaviour is that new-follower velocity moves shows far more than cumulative audience size does. That is why a show can appear in the top ten within days of a launch push and disappear a fortnight later while its download numbers stay flat. A large, stable, loyal audience does not by itself hold a chart position.

The underlying feed is Apple's public RSS output, so read Apple's own terms before republishing it, and attribute Apple as the source. This page does not add a licence of its own to Apple's data. If you need a redistributable, openly licensed podcast dataset instead, Podcast Index publishes an open index and API.

No. There is no sign-up, no key, and no payment. The chart endpoint is unauthenticated and rate limited to 30 requests per window per client, which is well above what interactive use needs. If you do hit the limit the page shows a plain rate-limit message and the next request a moment later succeeds.

Only loosely. Categories differ enormously in how many shows compete in them and how much listening they attract, so the same numeric position represents very different amounts of activity in Comedy, News, and, say, Government. Ranks are meaningful within one storefront and one category over time, which is why comparing the same chart week over week is far more informative than comparing two charts side by side.

Further reading

Sources and further reading

More free tools

Other podcaster tools

For Podcasters

Claim your show and get free listener intelligence

See the real questions your audience is asking about your episodes. Free for all podcasters.